Following the Centre's refusal to reimburse the 6% duty, Punjab has raised a Centre-State dispute under Article 131 of the Constitution, arguing that “the State Government has the exclusive right to determine the statutory duty to be levied on the purchase of foodgrains on behalf of the Central Government.”
The Punjab government says, 'The Central Government has no legal power to consider or act on the tariff levied by the State under any Parliamentary Act… As per the Memorandum of Understanding entered into by the States and the Centre, the Central Government is entitled to fix rates for procurement of foodgrains for distribution under Central schemes.'
PressNews24 provides latest news, bollywood news, breaking news hollywood, top tech news, business standard news, indian economy news, world economy news, travel news, mumbai news, latest news mumbai loksabha election 2024, video viral news, delhi news, Only at PressNews24.in
The Punjab government argues that it is using the two levies of 3% each — market fee and rural development fee — entirely to improve rural infrastructure such as roads, maintain clean drinking water and storage facilities, and promote sale and disposal of agricultural produce after harvesting.
The Centre says the 2% levy given to states in addition to the cost of grain was to be used only for developing facilities at procurement centres to benefit poor and marginal farmers. This levy should not be used 'as a means of raising funds for other activities or for augmenting state revenues'.
The central government has accused Punjab of misusing the funds collected through levy. It said the Punjab government was misusing the funds collected through levy reimbursement to “set up government educational institutions, repair roads, build panchayat ghars and dharamshalas and waive farmers' loans”.