Not only pollution but also rules are in the air… Why did the Supreme Court get angry on air pollution in Delhi?

show me even one step

A bench of Justice Abhay S Oka and Justice AG Masih was hearing the case. The bench told the Commission that there was complete non-compliance of the Act. The bench asked whether committees had been formed? Please show us even a single step taken, what instructions have you used under the Act? Just look at the affidavit. Show us even a single direction issued under Section 12 and others. The bench said that all this is up in the air. He has not mentioned anything about what he has said to the NCR states.
Stubble burning begins again! Supreme Court asked tough questions to CAQM, answers will have to be given by Friday

Supreme Court had asked for data

The Supreme Court had asked for data from CAQM two days ago. The court had said that all the officers will have to answer its questions. The Supreme Court said that the only issue we are going to consider today is CAQM. Not a single provision of the Act has been complied with by CQAM. See your affidavit, there is no compliance by this authority! Show us the instructions you followed. It's all up in the air.

Don't drag us into your agenda… Why did the Supreme Court say this to NCPCR, understand the whole matter

you remain a silent gaze

The Supreme Court bench told the Commission that everything is on paper, you are a silent spectator. The bench asked the CAQM president why the commission meets once in three months. When the court mentioned the problem of stubble burning, the CAQM said, “The incidents of fire have reduced considerably.” The court asked whether any action was taken under Section 14 of the CAQM Act? This includes imposing penalty for violation of the provisions of the Act, rule, order or direction. We do not think so.