Natasha is getting taunts, fingers are also pointed at Suzanne! Why so much uproar over alimony?

Fingers were also pointed at Suzanne

Seeing Natasha being trolled over alimony reminds us of Hrithik-Sussanne's divorce 11 years ago. Similarly, at that time too, there were strong rumours of Sussanne getting a huge alimony of 380 crores from Hrithik. Even then people had put Sussanne in the dock. Whereas Hrithik himself had expressed his displeasure by calling this news false. He himself had tweeted that all these are fabricated news, through this his close ones are being insulted and their patience is being tested. Despite this, even today many reports keep coming that his divorce is the most expensive. Apart from this, such discussions are also heard about the alimony received by Karisma Kapoor from her husband Sanjay Kapoor, Amrita Singh from Saif Ali Khan and Aamir Khan's first wife Reena Dutta.

Alimony is a woman's legal right

Not only celebrities, but even in ordinary families, women who ask for alimony or maintenance are mistreated. Whereas in reality it is their legal right. Rekha Agarwal, a senior advocate of the Supreme Court, says that even in common divorce cases, when it comes to alimony and maintenance, similar things are said that he looted so much money. The only reason for marriage was that he left her helpless. Whereas this should not happen at all, because this is her legal right. In both the Hindu Marriage Act and the Special Marriage Act, the law has given the right to maintenance on separation and alimony after divorce, but it is not that whatever the girl asks for, she will get it. For this, both the boy and the girl will have to declare their movable and immovable property and income. The court decides alimony and maintenance on the basis of all these parameters – the boy's property, income, who all are dependent on him, if he has a child, then with whom is he living. It is not that after divorce the wife will automatically take 50% share. Another important thing here is that there are two types of divorce. The first is by mutual consent, in which both the parties decide everything by mutual consent. While the second is fought in the court. In the case which is fought, the court hears the claims of both the parties and decides the alimony or maintenance allowance on the basis of their movable and immovable property. Whereas in mutual consent, the court has no role. In that, if the girl wants, she may not take even a single rupee of alimony or if the boy wants, he can transfer everything in her name.

Women keep dragging their heels

Regarding the alimony cases of common people, Rekha Agarwal says, 'These rights have been made in the law after a lot of thought and close investigation. There are many provisions in them. For example, the allowances or alimony of these celebrities are higher because according to the Supreme Court, even after divorce, the girl has the right to live the same life that she was living in her husband's house. On the other hand, if she earns herself and is settled, then her alimony is reduced. By the way, in general cases, except for celebrities, most women have to struggle a lot to get alimony. The court cases go on for years. Then, tired and tired, the women settle for half the alimony of their demand. On top of that, if the couple has a daughter, then the father is not ready to take her. In most cases, the mother takes her custody. Even if the girl is less than five years old, her custody goes to the mother. Just imagine, if in such a situation the woman does not get any allowance or alimony then how complicated her future life will become.

Men also get alimony

Although alimony is usually given to the wife, but in some circumstances the husband can also demand alimony. Such a situation arises when the wife's income is higher and the husband's income is lower or the husband is unemployed. Then the husband has to prove by giving an affidavit in the court that his wife earns more than him or she is financially incapable.

In foreign countries everything is divided in half

Amidst the news of Natasha being given 70% of Hardik's property as alimony, an old video of Hardik is also going viral, in which he is telling that he has transferred all his property to his mother's name, so that in future he does not have to give 50% share to his wife (in case of divorce). But Rekha says, it is not written anywhere in our law that the girl will take 50% of the property. In America, it happens that in case of divorce, the property of both the husband and wife is automatically divided in half. If reports are to be believed, this trend has also been seen in America that women there are richer than men despite low salary, the reason for which is the alimony received on divorce.