Finance Minister promises to maintain fiscal discipline with heavy spending on infrastructure


Swaminathan S. Anklesaria Iyer
When the economy performs well, the finance minister's numbers also rise. GDP growth was 8.2 percent in the last financial year. Tax collection increased and the Reserve Bank paid huge dividends. With all this, Finance Minister Nirmala Sitharaman has done wonders on both political and economic fronts. She has hit many targets with one arrow and deserves congratulations for this. Politically, this is a 'save the government' budget. Some experts were speculating that if the BJP did not please Nitish Kumar and Chandrababu Naidu, they could topple the government. In the budget, a lot of funds have been announced for Nitish's Bihar and Naidu's Andhra Pradesh, which will satisfy both for some time, even if their demand for special status is not met.

WhatsApp Group Join Now
Telegram Group Join Now

From a policy perspective, it is the same as the previous budget. There is no mention of any major reform in it. And when GDP growth is so good, why take so much risk? Actually, the message of this budget is policy stability in the medium term. The budget is excellent in terms of macro-economy. The fiscal deficit has been promised to be reduced to 4.9% from last year's 5.9% in this financial year. This target is commendable with the proposal of a huge expenditure of 3.4% of GDP on infrastructure. The allies have been made happy in the budget. Schemes to increase employment have been presented. There are incentive schemes for tourism. Along with all this, there is also tax relief for the BJP-supporting middle class.

PressNews24 provides latest news, bollywood news, breaking news hollywood, top tech news, business standard news, indian economy news, world economy news, travel news, mumbai news, latest news mumbai loksabha election 2024, video viral news, delhi news, Only at PressNews24.in

Editorial: Reflection on youth power, promise of next round of reforms
Yes, the long term capital gain tax has been increased from 10 to 12.5%, but it is much less than the US's 20%. The benefit of indexation on capital gains from real estate has been removed. This may increase the interest of those investing in the property market in the stock market. Security transaction tax on futures and options has been increased. At the same time, short term capital gain tax on some assets has been increased from 15% to 20%. This will compensate for the concessions given by the government in some items. Shareholders will now have to pay tax on buybacks, as has been the case with dividends earlier.

Import duty on gold and silver has been reduced to 6%. This should have been done in previous years as high import duty has led to smuggling of these metals and has also encouraged money laundering. Employment remains a politically sensitive issue. The budget has announced incentives for employers and first-time employees. The government will reimburse companies up to Rs 3,000 per month for their employee provident fund liability for up to two years. The finance minister estimates that this will create 50 lakh new jobs, but will it happen?

Why would companies hire people they don't need at a nominal subsidy? And why does the finance minister think that giving a month's salary to first-time job seekers will create 2.10 crore jobs? It has to be understood that these people are desperate for jobs in the organised sector, so why should they get a subsidy? The finance minister's internship programme is good, but it will only be partially successful in addressing the shortage of skilled people in the country.

Opinion: 'Election budget' after elections! There is only politics in this economics!
The Finance Minister's list of next generation economic reforms is also disappointing. Though the list is long, these are good intentions. Promises were made about them, but no action plan was presented. Now take the Mumbai-Ahmedabad bullet train project, which is also close to the Prime Minister's heart. It has not been completed in the last 10 years due to problems related to land acquisition. The country needs such next generation reforms.

Leave a Comment